Power of Culture Blog
Register for this webinar on Dec. 6
To experience this site in your native language, click below.
Para visitar este sitio web en su idioma nativo, haga clic a continuación.
Para experimentar este site em sua língua nativa, clique abaixo.
This is part 1 of a 3-part series in support of our Safe Harbors Program.
Achieving safe harbor during the current COVID-19 pandemic includes understanding how cash moves in and out of your organization week by week, creating several ‘what if’ scenarios and budgets based on that data, and finally, working with the organization’s governance and management to craft the path forward. Today, we outline the first step in the process, understanding how to conduct cash flow planning during a crisis.
As we seek to react to the current pandemic, cultural nonprofits have three overlapping needs:
The COVID-19 crisis is particularly challenging due to the ongoing nature of closures and physical distancing, with no true way to gauge end dates. It is best to focus planning on the areas you have stewardship, or at least some control over. To aid in the process of response, recovery, and resiliency, we recommend three initial steps:
Step #1: Conduct weekly (not monthly) cash flow projections
Step #2: Establish your priorities and determine how they align with your organizational values
Step #3: Plan your response
In non-crisis times, cash flow planning makes life easier in developing funding reports, preparing for board meetings, and anticipating challenges and opportunities. During a crisis, it provides invaluable data to help lead organizations through difficult decisions on their path to safe harbor and recovery.
The most obvious returns in traditional cash flow planning come in both financial management and governance tasks. By understanding the trends in cash throughout the year, organizations can determine how much cash to keep in reserve to access during months when cash is low, and determine whether short-term debt (e.g., a line of credit) would be an appropriate funding source, and if so, how much credit would be necessary. From a governance perspective, a cash flow document readies the board to engage regardless of their financial background and enables informed discussions about strategy and policies. From a funding and stakeholder communication perspective, cash flow projection can be an effective, data-centric communication tool. By grounding an ask in the organization’s current reality and the timing of the funding they plan to receive, leaders may be able to engage board members or funders to give early or during challenging times of the year. Finally, from a mission and program perspective, cash flow planning enables leadership to identify a path to mission fulfillment and ensure that programs are not unnecessarily interrupted.
However, in a crisis, week to week cash flow planning helps leaders understand how they can create a safe harbor and plan the framework needed for recovery.
Short term cash and liquidity is important in a crisis. Weekly forecasts facilitate greater net cash visibility, especially if cash is tight.
Projecting cash in a crisis is a real-money exercise. When thinking about cash, leaders want to answer the question of whether they have enough cash on hand to meet their expenses weekly. Revenue, for those using accrual accounting, is recorded when you receive revenue, not necessarily when you receive cash. For example, you record a grant as revenue when you receive the award letter. For an education organization that is fee-based, you record revenue when you deliver the services. In both cases, you may not receive the actual cash until later, and sometimes it is several months later. It is important to have a clear understanding of revenue, but when doing crisis cash flow projections, estimate the timing of cash receipts rather than revenue. The same is true of expenses. You may spend thousands of dollars in the months leading up to a special event before you actually host the event. Expenses would not technically register until you host the event in accrual accounting, but for the purposes of crisis cash flow, you need to know from a management perspective when you spent that money. With cash flow projections, cash in and cash out will not always be the same as revenue and expenses as recorded in the accrual system. In a sense, it is very similar to how one would record transactions in a checkbook. It is also important to note that restricted cash needs to be tracked separately. If you have cash on hand that must be spent for a specific purpose, you do not want to lump it into overall cash because it would distort your perspective on the cash that you currently have available to spend.
All cash projections will have some uncertainty and almost never plays out exactly as one would expect. You may receive new information that changes your assumptions and the data in the document, particularly during a crisis. But it is still important to do your best to project, based on the past and what you know about the future so that you can effectively guide your organization through the uncertainty that is inherent during a crisis. Please use the NonProfit Finance Fund crisis cash flow template to help you conduct short-term, 13-week cash flows.
Once leadership understands how cash is moving throughout the organization on a micro level, it is time to consider the hard questions:
Cash flow planning is critical in helping leadership establish these priorities and the corresponding time horizon for decision-making. The flow helps leaders know if they have enough cash on hand to operate, either “normally” (pre-COVID), in total hibernation, or somewhere in between. To aid in this decision-making, cultural nonprofits should think about cash inflow options available to them:
Next, leadership should consider cash outflow questions, such as:
Do not spend cash
Governance and Cash Issues vs Cash Flow Issues
As fiduciary agents of organizations, board members have the responsibility for approving the budget and monitoring the assets necessary to operate (including cash!). Here are some tips on working with the board to understand cash position and decision-making:
Contingency planning can be a complex, program by program exercise, or as simple as asking yourselves what you would do if revenue fell by 10%, 20%, etc. Organizations need to prepare for the worst case; you do not want to be forced to make decisions that your staff, constituents, and board are not ready for. Leadership is not expected to solve the crisis by itself. Some of best solutions come from outside the organization’s senior management, such as the people delivering your services. Program staff may be in the best position to help think about options. In addition, the board can help prioritize and implement the alternatives that get identified.
Leadership should specify the triggers that will cause the organization to move to Plan B or C. For example, an X% decline in foundation grants might lead us to do Y. Or, if our membership or number of patrons is X% below where it was last year at the same time…what would your response be? What cuts might you make?
Among the hardest things for organizations to acknowledge is that it is possible that a given situation is not solvable; that viable options include substantial reduction in activities. In this case, exploring restructuring opportunities (like downsizing, partnering, merging) might be necessary. Some of these options may in fact be temporary depending on what opportunities present themselves in the future, while some, like a merger or soft-landing closure, can be the most responsible option in stewarding the organization’s mission and protecting public good.
In summary, good financial decision-making requires timely, accurate, and transparent financial information regardless of the size and type of organization. Tools, like Nonprofit Finance Fund cash flow projection template will not make difficult decisions for leadership, but instead, provides the data needed to build multiple scenarios and budgets, and ultimately, craft the path forward.
Part 2 in this series: Building Organizational Scenarios and Testing Budgets
Part 3 in this series: Managing in an Age of Crisis